The conservative columnist attempts to chart a middle course on the question of transgender youth. Unfortunately, it’s not grounded in the reality of how families and children work.

An article on the Utah ban on gender-affirming care contrasts Republicans opinions with those of activists, subtly downplaying the medical consensus on gender affirming care.

A study that contradicts the right’s position on gender affirming care provides a useful example of how right wing writers hand-wave away transphobia’s many contradictions.

Trans activists, by which we really mean twitter randos, are at it again!

Contrary to Fox’s propaganda, the bill does not impact women’s sports teams, prisons, bathrooms, changing rooms, or safety in any way.

Conservative men took to Twitter to discuss women’s empowerment after Anne Jakrajutatip, a trans woman, bought the Miss Universe Pageant.

What follows will be a non-exhaustive list of minor crimes that Assigned Media does not condone.

Archbishop Samuel J. Aquila of Denver complained that religious communities are being unfairly targeted by people seeking to understand anti-LGBTQ+ hate in the wake of a mass shooting.

Shrier, along with Bari Weiss and Matt Taibbi, have been given access to a large amount of data on Twitter’s past moderation decisions by Elon Musk. The three share at least one ideological belief in common, anti-trans bias.

Some right wing writers are afraid that a book for girls about loving your body, which includes some trans inclusive content, will turn their children trans.

One common belief held by many transphobes is that there’s a lot of money supporting trans rights, but the numbers say somthing completely different.

A Kansas library under threat from conservative lawmakers serves as one of many examples of how open government censorship has grown after years of bad-faith defenses of free speech.

It’s a fair cop, guv. The National Review reports on the ban of Mike Pesca and Parker Molloy from journa.host.

WPATH is often criticized by trans people for its medicalized, cautious approach to setting standards for gender affirming care, but their response to the new conversion-therapy tinged NHS guidelines is careful, methodical, scientifically sound, and an absolute banger.

Some on the right are barely masking their support for the slaughter of innocents at Club Q. The rest deny there’s any problem with their extreme rhetoric at all.

The anti-trans moral panic has a body count, but you’d never know it if you confine yourself to right wing outlets.

What can we say but fuuuuuuuu

The standards for mainstream reporting on trans issues are distressingly bad.

Misgendering trans people is portrayed by the Daily Signal as the key to political unity and healing of divisions.

What does it mean, when straight reactionaries take up the cause of gays and lesbians, standing up for their right not to be part of an acronym or an umbrella term. Obviously it's not good for trans people. But, is it even good for gay men and lesbians?